(PDF) Twitter Files #14: The Russiagate Lies, PartOne–The Fake Tale of Russian Bots and the #ReleaseTheMemo Hashtag
Thread by Matt Taibbi: “At a crucial moment in a years-long furor, Democrats denounced a report about flaws in the Trump-Russia investigation, saying it was boosted by Russian ‘bots’ and ‘trolls.’”
Author’s Note
‣ I adjusted the Twitter Files' numerical order to align with Matt Taibbi's assigned numbers. I re-assigned Alex Berenson's post to "#XX" and Followed Taibbi's numerical order with #14 assigned to his latest release (Russiagate Lies, Part 1).
‣ I've made slight format adjustments to the text with this simple text format guide:
▶️ BOLD: Emphasizing topic, word, or quote.
▶️ Italics: Slight format edits (quotes, bullets, etc.)
▶️ Links: Embedding resourceful links
▶️ CAPS: FIRST MENTION OF NAMES
Below is MATT TAIBBI’s latest Twitter thread (The Russiagate Lies, PartOne) in various formats with referencing images and screenshots. In addition, I’ve added links to each of Taibbi’s tweets in his thread.
I encourage you to follow Taibbi on Twitter and subscribe to his Substack. Taibbi is performing incredible work and deserves ALL the credit for exposing the shocking exchanges between BigTech and government officials.
THREAD: Twitter Files #14
THE RUSSIAGATE LIES
One: The Fake Tale of Russian Bots and the #ReleaseTheMemo Hashtag
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
At a crucial moment in a years-long furor, Democrats denounced a report about flaws in the Trump-Russia investigation, saying it was boosted by Russian “bots” and “trolls.”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Twitter officials were aghast, finding no evidence of Russian influence:
“We are feeding congressional trolls.”
“Not any.. significant activity connected to Russia.”
“Putting the cart before the horse assuming this is propaganda/bots.”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Twitter warned politicians and media they not only lacked evidence, but had evidence the accounts weren't Russian - and were roundly ignored.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
On January 18th, 2018, Republican DEVIN NUNES submitted a classified memo to the House Intel Committee detailing abuses by the FBI in obtaining FISA surveillance authority against Trump-connected figures, including the crucial role played by the infamous “Steele Dossier”.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
The Nunes assertions would virtually all be verified in a report by Justice Department Inspector General MICHAEL HOROWITZ in December 2019.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Nonetheless, national media in January and early February of 2018 denounced the Nunes report in oddly identical language, calling it a “joke.”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
On January 23rd, 2018, Senator DIANNE FEINSTEIN (D-CA) and congressman ADAM SCHIFF (D-CA) published an open letter saying the hashtag “gained the immediate attention and assistance of social media accounts linked to Russian influence operations ”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Feinstein/Schiff said the Nunes memo “distorts” classified information, but note they didn't call it incorrect.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Connecticut Senator RICHARD BLUMENTHAL followed suit, publishing a letter saying,
“We find it reprehensible that Russian agents have so eagerly manipulated innocent Americans.”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Feinstein, Schiff, Blumenthal, and media members all pointed to the same source: the Hamilton 68 dashboard created by former FBI counterintelligence official CLINT WATTS, under the auspices of the Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD).
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
The dashboard, which featured a crude picture of VLADIMIR PUTIN deviously blowing evil red Twitter birds into the atmosphere, was vague in how it reached its conclusions.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Inside Twitter, executives panned Watts, Hamilton 68, and the Alliance for Securing Democracy.
Two key complaints:
Hamilton 68 seemed to be everyone’s only source
No one was checking with Twitter
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
“I encourage you to be skeptical of Hamilton 68's take on this, which as far as I can tell is the only source for these stories,” said Global Policy Communications Chief (and future WH and NSC spokesperson) EMILY HORNE.
She added: “It's a comms play for ASD.”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
“All the swirl is based on Hamilton,” said Trust and Safety chief YOEL ROTH.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
“If ASD isn't going to fact-check with us, we should feel free to correct the record on their work” said Policy VP CARLOS MONIE.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Roth couldn't find any Russian connection to #ReleaseTheMemo - at all.
“I just reviewed the accounts that posted the first 50 tweets with #releasethememo and.. none of them show any signs of affiliation to Russia.”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
“We investigated, found that engagement as overwhelmingly organic, and driven by VITs” - Very Important Tweeters, including Wikileaks and congressman STEVE KING.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
A staffer for “DiFi” - Feinstein - agreed it would be “helpful to know” how Hamilton 68 goes by "the process by which they decide an account is Russian."
But, only AFTER Feinstein published her letter about Russian influence.[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
When Twitter spoke to a Blumenthal staffer, they tried to “wave him off” because “we don't believe these are bots.”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Added another:
“It might be worth nudging Blumenthal's staffer that it could be in his boss' best interest not to go out there because it could come back to make him look silly.”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
One Twitter exec even tried to negotiate, implying an undisclosed future PR concession if Blumenthal would lay off on this:
"It seems like there are other wins we could offer him."
Blumenthal published his letter anyway.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Execs eventually grew frustrated over what they saw as a circular process—presented with claims of Russian activity, even when denied, led to more claims.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
They expressed this explicitly to Blumenthal’s camp, saying “Twitter spent a lot of resources” on this request and the reward from Blumenthal shouldn’t be round after round of requests.
“We can’t do a user notice each time this happens.”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Eventually Twitter staff realize “Blumenthal isn't looking for real and nuanced solutions” but “just wants to get credit for pushing us further.”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Ultimately senior executives talked about “feeding congressional trolls” and compared their situation to the children's book, “If You Give a Mouse a Cookie.”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
In the story, if you give a mouse a cookie, he'll want a glass of milk, which will lead to a wave of other exhausting requests, at the end of which he'll want a glass of milk. And one more cookie.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
The metaphor for the endless Russia requests was so perfect, one exec wrote, “I'm legit embarrassed I didn't think of that first.”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Despite universal internal conviction that there were no Russians in the story, Twitter went on to follow a slavish pattern of not challenging Russia claims on the record.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Outside counsel from DC-connected firms like Debevoise and Plimpton advised Twitter to use language like,
“With respect to particular hashtags, we take seriously any activity that may represent an abuse of our platform.”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
As a result, reporters from the AP to Politico to NBC to Rolling Stone continued to hammer the “Russian bots” theme, despite a total lack of evidence.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Russians weren't just blamed for #ReleaseTheMemo but #SchumerShutdown, #ParklandShooting, even #GunControlNow - to “widen the divide,” according to the New York Times.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Re #SchumerShutdown and #ReleaseTheMemo, the internal guidance was,
“Both hashtags appear to be organically trending.”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
NBC, Politico, AP, Times, Business Insider, and other media outlets who played up the “Russian bots” story - even Rolling Stone - all declined to comment for this story.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
The staffs of Feinstein, Schiff, and Blumenthal also declined comment.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Who did comment? Devin Nunes.
“Schiff and the Democrats falsely claimed Russians were behind the Release the Memo hashtag, all my investigative work... By spreading the Russia collusion hoax, they instigated one of the greatest outbreaks of mass delusion in U.S. history.”
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
This #ReleaseTheMemo episode is just one of many in the #TwitterFiles. The Russiagate scandal was built on the craven dishonesty of politicians and reporters, who for years ignored the absence of data to fictional scare headlines.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
For more, watch @ShellenbergerMD, @bariweiss, @Ihfang, @davidzweig, @AlexBerenson, and more.
Read Taibbi.Substack.Com for more on why “America Needs Truth and Reconciliation on Russiagate.”[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Twitter had no editorial input on this story. Searches were carried out by third parties, so the documents could be limited.
[ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴛᴡᴇᴇᴛ]
Wasn't the Alex Berenson post #14, making this #15?