Before Dead Voters, Ballot Drops, and Rigged Voting Machines, Google Rigs The Minds of Undecided Voters
Google continues to control more votes than one would think, as one research shows it can sway up to 80 percent of undecided votes.
Peter Navarro reported that The Big Steal of 2020 was the work of “a thousand irregularities” rather than a single “silver bullet.” While building off Navarro's perspective, I'm intrigued with the viewpoint of identifying methods to steal an election preceding ballot dumps, duplicate vote counts, dead voter counts, and rigged voting machines.
As we witness historic and improbable razor-thin election wins by Democrats, with the two recent wins coming out of Arizona and Georgia, we are left with more questions and doubts. We continue to see the same patterns played out: pausing ballot counts, early race calls by mainstream media, and Democrat stronghold counties being the last to report their numbers, conveniently placing Democrat candidates over the edge. One pattern is overlooked: Google's continual influence on undecided voters.
Despite the rise in Google alternatives, it's reported that the monopolistic search engine continues a heavy influence on undecided voters of specific demographics. Robert Epstein reports that his team has found worrying patterns after tracking Google's election interference. Epstein, a Ph.D. from Harvard University and former editor-in-chief of Psychology Today, is a Senior Research Psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology.
Epstein deservingly boasts his team's credentials in the following snippet:
“My research team is currently monitoring online political content being sent to voters in swing states through more than 2,500 computers owned by a politically-diverse group of registered voters (our “field agents”)…
We are aggregating and analyzing search results on the Google and Bing search engines, messages displayed on Google’s home page, autoplay videos suggested on YouTube, tweets sent to users by the Twitter company (as opposed to tweets sent by other users), email suppression on Gmail, and more.”
Epstein continues by describing the new forms of influence and their stunning impact on election voters:
“Search results that favor one candidate (in other words, that lead people who click on high-ranking results to web pages that glorify that candidate) can shift the voting preferences of undecided voters by up to 80 percent in some demographic groups after a single search. Carefully crafted search suggestions that flash at you while you are typing a search term can turn a 50/50 split among undecided voters into a 90/10 split with no one knowing they have been manipulated. A single question-and-answer interaction on a digital personal assistant can shift the voting preferences of undecided voters by more than 40 percent.
…preliminary analyses of the data we have collected so far in 2022… swing states, and especially in Wisconsin, Arizona, and Florida, we are finding a high level of liberal bias in Google search results, but not in search results on Bing (the same pattern we have found in every election since 2016). In several swing states, 92 percent of the autoplay videos being fed to YouTube users are coming from liberal news sources (YouTube is owned by Google).”
After digesting Epstein's findings, it's a helpful reminder that, According to Oberlo, “Google currently holds a whopping 92.18 percent of the worldwide search engine market share.”
Now, as Google remains the top search engine, we see Bing Search comes in second place; however, this is a deceiving view as the following chart demonstrates that Bing merely serves as a doorstep to access Google's search engine.
https://www.oberlo.com/blog/google-search-statistics
In addition to Google and BigTech's algorithmic political influence, it's important to remember the number of contributions to The Democrat Party coming out of these organizations. According to OpenSecrets.org in 2020, BigTech alone donated $50+ million to Democrats:
“… most donations coming from company employees, Alphabet contributed around $21 million to Democrats in the 2020 election cycle, with Amazon contributing around $9.4 million. Facebook, Microsoft and Apple contributed about $6 million, $12.7 million and $6.6 million to Democrats, respectively”
Google's political influence remains high despite the tremendous work done by patriots and anti-woke leaders in the technology industry. Google will continue to mask propaganda in subtle ways that come off as “pure facts.” Below I've embedded companies owned by Google and Google's parent company called, Alphabet, Inc.
We are witnessing the closest elections in this country's history. Coincidence? I think not. Google and its woke employees will continue to do the adversary's work by penetrating sensitive topics that sway undecided voters.
“There are no conspiracies, but there are also no coincidences.”
– Steven K. Bannon
My call to action for readers is strategically using search engines per your search topic. The following are three search engines I use before turning to Google Search: Free Spoke, Yandex, Brave Search.